17 Comments
Oct 12Liked by Garwhoungle

I very much hope you win. No man can become female (it is a biological impossibility) and it follows no man can be a lesbian. Any one who claims otherwise is supporting the violation and annihilation of lesbianism, every lesbian woman, every girl who'll grow up to be a lesbian and of lesbian cultures. This is the definition of homophobia. And these are the same people who support chemically and surgically trying to turn lesbians into straight men. More homophobia.

Expand full comment

Excellent piece.

Very similar to the claim being brought by the Lesbian Action Group in Australia.

Best of luck to LAVA.

Have cross posted

https://dustymasterson.substack.com/p/gallipoli

Dusty

Expand full comment
author

Thanks and Yes! Why are people so terrified of lesbians caucusing. One of my draft articles in the series is looking at a few case studies of anti-lesbianism im different countries and I have included LAG. It might even make it to publication. I do a lot of drafts! And thanks for the cross-post.

Expand full comment
Sep 30Liked by Garwhoungle

As always. brilliantly executed and incisive!

Expand full comment
author

Thanks Carol!

Expand full comment

What does 'OG' mean?

Expand full comment
author

A particular kind of slang for original. Often with accompanying respect for that.

Expand full comment

Did you know that the NCW page you linked in your post has been taken down? Great article anyway.

Expand full comment
author

Hmm I am still getting a live link from my end Sue. https://www.ncwnz.org.nz/feminism-and-trans-rights-must-go-hand-in-hand/

Expand full comment
Sep 30Liked by Garwhoungle

It came up then said ‘ server not responding’. Looks like a problem at their end. Terrible statement. How did NCW come to this position?

Expand full comment
author
Sep 30·edited Sep 30Author

Yeah I wonder. I do think she (edited by she I mean Gill Greer who wrote that press statement and was head of NCW for a while) might have been kicking around in the same international development circles as Paul Hunt, our trans-focused ex Human Rights Commissioner. I feel like both have been very open to the idea that anything is human rights if you just say it is. It's a quick step to such human rights must be defended at all costs and without question and thus anti-women behaviour is acceptable. Happy to be corrected in my theory. It's very sad.

Expand full comment

What interests me us on what grounds NCW seems to be claiming that thus is the feeling of their membership. Was this issue canvassed around member organisations - by vote? Was it decided by an elite committee of just a few? Was it written during lockdown? I can’t believe that women as a group can give up our sec based rights so easily. Have you got a copy of FOWL’s submission to the Law Commission?

Expand full comment
author
author
Sep 30·edited Oct 28Author

So the membership voted for it. Their flagship campaign is now Gender Equal NZ which focuses on trans rights. I don't know why they maintain the CEDAW role, they are not really interested in women any more.

Expand full comment

Spot on Garwhoungle. The irony is that a lot of younger women today are turning off men, regardless of innate sexuality, as men (and boys) become increasingly porn addled and entitled, thanks to the patriarchy. I don't know if you saw the 2010 lesbian film 'The Kids Are All Right', but even at the time I thought it was well out of line showing the lesbian couple not only 'enjoying' heterosexual porn but one of them having a very intense fling with a man. I reckon these bastards have been chipping away at women's rights and lesbian rights for many decades now, twisting everyone's heads to question the sense and importance of women's boundaries. And yeah, the co-opting of the feminist Left was their master stroke. 😣

Expand full comment