Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Katrina Biggs's avatar

I listened to that silly pompous young man on that silly older woman’s radio show, and did have to have a wry laugh when he said how “alarmist” we all were for thinking bad things about puberty blockers, and then when on to be all alarmist about what would happen to kids if they didn’t get them.

If we were all wearing Mao-style clothing - i.e. no lipstick, high heels and dresses - I wonder how many girls and boys, and older men, would then feel a compelling urge to be the opposite sex?

Expand full comment
Tracy Bee's avatar

Great piece. Nice clear style. Thanks for that. Sex education in schools was primarily to fill a gap left by secular and prim parents who felt unable to clearly educate their children about puberty. Its terrible to think this service to our youth has been captured by gender ideology. You're so right, many children will be in positions where they are unsafe and the language they need to describe this unsafe environment is being stripped from them in a way.

Later on in college the sex education offered takes a bizarre turn with kids talked to about fisting and choking as if these are run of the mill every day sexual practices. It's all gotten so dam weird.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts